Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: A BASK surgical practice guideline.

{"article_title":"Revision knee replacement surgery in the NHS: A BASK surgical practice guideline.","author":"Kalson NS, Mathews JA, Phillips JRA, Baker PN, Price AJ, Toms AD","journal_title":"The Knee","issn":"1873-5800","isbn":"","publication_date":"2021-03-01","volume":"29","issue":"","first_page":"353","page_count":"","accession_number":"33690016","doi":"10.1016\/j.knee.2021.01.032","publisher":"Elsevier","doctype":"Journal Article","subjects":"United Kingdom; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Reoperation; Decision Making, Shared; Delphi Technique; Humans; Patient Care Team; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Outcome Assessment; Referral and Consultation; Regional Medical Programs; Reimbursement Mechanisms; State Medicine; United Kingdom","interest_area":["Orthopedic"," Surgery"],"abstract":"Background: Revision knee replacement (KR) is both challenging for the surgical team and expensive for the healthcare provider. Limited high quality evidence is available to guide decision-making. Aim: To provide guidelines for surgeons and units delivering revision KR services. Methods: A formal consensus process was followed by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, which included surgeons from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This was supported by analysis of National Joint Registry data. Results: There are a large number of surgeons operating at NHS sites who undertake a small number of revision KR procedures. To optimise patient outcomes and deliver cost-effective care high-volume revision knee surgeons working at high volume centres should undertake revision KR. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a revision KR service and sets out: The current landscape of revision KR in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Service organisation within a network model. The necessary infrastructure required to provide a sustainable revision service. Outcome metrics and auditable standards. Financial mechanisms to support this service model. Conclusions: Revision KR patients being treated in the NHS should be provided with the best care available. This report sets out a framework to both guide and support revision KR surgeons and centres to achieve this aim. Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Crown Copyright \u00a9 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=33690016","isPdfLink":false,"isSAML":false,"an":"33690016","number_other":"","type_pub":"","issn_electronic":"1873-5800","languages":"English","language":"eng","date_entry":"Date Created: 20210310 Date Completed: 20210707 Latest Revision: 20220122","date_update":"20240105","titleSource":"The Knee [Knee] 2021 Mar; Vol. 29, pp. 353-364. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 06.","date_pub_cy":"","type_document":"","contract_publisher":"","authored_on":"2021-03-01","description":"Background: Revision knee replacement (KR) is both challenging for the surgical team and expensive for the healthcare provider. Limited high quality evidence is available to guide decision-making.<br \/>Aim: To provide guidelines for surgeons and units delivering revision KR services.<br \/>Methods: A formal consensus process was followed by BASK's Revision Knee Working Group, which included surgeons from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This was supported by analysis of National Joint Registry data.<br \/>Results: There are a large number of surgeons operating at NHS sites who undertake a small number of revision KR procedures. To optimise patient outcomes and deliver cost-effective care high-volume revision knee surgeons working at high volume centres should undertake revision KR. This document outlines practice guidelines for units providing a revision KR service and sets out: The current landscape of revision KR in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Service organisation within a network model. The necessary infrastructure required to provide a sustainable revision service. Outcome metrics and auditable standards. Financial mechanisms to support this service model.<br \/>Conclusions: Revision KR patients being treated in the NHS should be provided with the best care available. This report sets out a framework to both guide and support revision KR surgeons and centres to achieve this aim.<br \/>Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br \/> (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)","upload_link":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=mdl&AN=33690016&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds","no_of_pages":"","authored_by":"Kalson NS, Mathews JA, Phillips JRA, Baker PN, Price AJ, Toms AD"}