Guidelines for Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for Detection of Wound Bacterial Burden Based on Delphi Consensus.

Select Content Type
Clinical Guidelines
Authored By
Oropallo AR, Andersen C, Abdo R, Hurlow J, Kelso M, Melin M, Serena TE
Authored On
Interests
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Speciality
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Book Detail
volume
11
ISSN
2075-4418
Publication Date
Actions
Download in App
Event Data
{"article_title":"Guidelines for Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for Detection of Wound Bacterial Burden Based on Delphi Consensus.","author":"Oropallo AR, Andersen C, Abdo R, Hurlow J, Kelso M, Melin M, Serena TE","journal_title":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)","issn":"2075-4418","isbn":"","publication_date":"2021-07-06","volume":"11","issue":"7","first_page":"","page_count":"","accession_number":"34359302","doi":"10.3390\/diagnostics11071219","publisher":"MDPI AG","doctype":"Guideline","subjects":"Wound Care","interest_area":["Infectious Disease & Vaccines"],"abstract":"Excessive levels of bacteria impede wound healing and can lead to infectious complications. Unfortunately, clinical signs and symptoms of elevated bacterial burden are often unreliable. As a result, point--of--care fluorescence imaging, used to detect critical bacterial burden in wounds, is becoming widely recognized and adopted by clinicians across the globe as an accepted and added component of wound assessment protocol. A Delphi method was employed to establish consensus guidelines describing fluorescence imaging use. A multidisciplinary panel of 32 wound experts (56% MD, 22% podiatrist, 12.5% nurses\/nurse practitioners) representing multiple sites of service (e.g., hospital outpatient, inpatient, private office, long-term care) completed two rounds of online questionnaires. The Delphi included key topics, including competencies required to perform imaging, clinical indications for imaging (e.g., signs\/symptoms present, procedures warranting imaging), frequency of imaging, and a clinical workflow algorithm. Describing their clinical experiences of imaging impact, >80% reported changes in treatment plans, 96% reported that imaging-informed treatment plans led to improved wound healing, 78% reported reduced rates of amputations, and 83% reported reduced rates of microbiological sampling. The guidelines provided here will help to standardize use of fluorescence imaging among wound care providers and enhance the quality of patient care.","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=34359302","isPdfLink":true,"isSAML":false,"an":"34359302","number_other":"","type_pub":"","issn_print":"2075-4418","languages":"English","language":"eng","date_entry":"Date Created: 20210807 Latest Revision: 20210809","date_update":"20240105","titleSource":"Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) [Diagnostics (Basel)] 2021 Jul 06; Vol. 11 (7). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 06.","date_pub_cy":"","type_document":"","contract_publisher":"","authored_on":"2021-07-06","description":"Excessive levels of bacteria impede wound healing and can lead to infectious complications. Unfortunately, clinical signs and symptoms of elevated bacterial burden are often unreliable. As a result, point--of--care fluorescence imaging, used to detect critical bacterial burden in wounds, is becoming widely recognized and adopted by clinicians across the globe as an accepted and added component of wound assessment protocol. A Delphi method was employed to establish consensus guidelines describing fluorescence imaging use. A multidisciplinary panel of 32 wound experts (56% MD, 22% podiatrist, 12.5% nurses\/nurse practitioners) representing multiple sites of service (e.g., hospital outpatient, inpatient, private office, long-term care) completed two rounds of online questionnaires. The Delphi included key topics, including competencies required to perform imaging, clinical indications for imaging (e.g., signs\/symptoms present, procedures warranting imaging), frequency of imaging, and a clinical workflow algorithm. Describing their clinical experiences of imaging impact, >80% reported changes in treatment plans, 96% reported that imaging-informed treatment plans led to improved wound healing, 78% reported reduced rates of amputations, and 83% reported reduced rates of microbiological sampling. The guidelines provided here will help to standardize use of fluorescence imaging among wound care providers and enhance the quality of patient care.","upload_link":"https:\/\/content.ebscohost.com\/cds\/retrieve?content=AQICAHiylJ_bvOB56hI8UzTN6Ryruh7a0kiIBN_ANwtaWYjmxwHDWTihuXV1zmXs3XDsY9CQAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDGEXG60qmF_YKcbHeAIBEICBm4lzswyl7TYIXV-EsFK-MmH6j_MUP8d4aQxNg8yBEdP2C1tyUz4pb8NdBuuvyfSw1tZiRhITfRf1M04OaOQxas_Jg_t3-L1IEzY5BMZVN3IXXypZovhMWAy0OhFdwxom89aNCRJ-msamD1WM9GpDZDxrFUbHSQ4cl1MKw-Se7udvBk8JQt_OA82NYapdsVg-v5tFFxuKu5aYtpRk","no_of_pages":"","authored_by":"Oropallo AR, Andersen C, Abdo R, Hurlow J, Kelso M, Melin M, Serena TE"}
ISSN
2075-4418
IS_Ebsco
true
Published Date