Building a Knowledge to Action Program in Stroke Rehabilitation.
Select Content Type
Clinical Guidelines
Authored By
Janzen S, McIntyre A, Richardson M, Britt E, Teasell R
Authored On
Interests
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Speciality
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Book Detail
volume
43
ISSN
0317-1671
Publication Date
Actions
Download in App
Event Data
{"article_title":"Building a Knowledge to Action Program in Stroke Rehabilitation.","author":"Janzen S, McIntyre A, Richardson M, Britt E, Teasell R","journal_title":"The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques","issn":"0317-1671","isbn":"","publication_date":"2016 Sep","volume":"43","issue":"5","first_page":"619","page_count":"","accession_number":"27456566","doi":"10.1017\/cjn.2016.258","publisher":"published by Cambridge University Press for the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation","doctype":"Journal Article","subjects":"Canada; Diffusion of Innovation; Knowledge Management; Stroke physiopathology; Stroke therapy; Stroke Rehabilitation; Translational Research, Biomedical; Canada; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans","interest_area":["Neurology"," Emergency Medicine"],"abstract":"The knowledge to action (KTA) process proposed by Graham et al (2006) is a framework to facilitate the development and application of research evidence into clinical practice. The KTA process consists of the knowledge creation cycle and the action cycle. The Evidence Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation is a foundational part of the knowledge creation cycle and has helped guide the development of best practice recommendations in stroke. The Rehabilitation Knowledge to Action Project is an audit-feedback process for the clinical implementation of best practice guidelines, which follows the action cycle. The objective of this review was to: (1) contextualize the Evidence Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Knowledge to Action Project within the KTA model and (2) show how this process led to improved evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Through this process, a single centre was able to change clinical practice and promote a culture that supports the use of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation.","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=27456566&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513","isPdfLink":true,"isSAML":false,"additionalInfo":{"Authored_By":"Janzen S, McIntyre A, Richardson M, Britt E, Teasell R","Journal_Info":"Publisher: published by Cambridge University Press for the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0415227 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0317-1671 (Print) Linking ISSN: 03171671 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Can J Neurol Sci Subsets: MEDLINE","Publication_Type":"Journal Article; Review","Published_Date":"2016-09-01","Source":"The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques [Can J Neurol Sci] 2016 Sep; Vol. 43 (5), pp. 619-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 26.","Languages":"English","MeSH_Terms":"Diffusion of Innovation* , Knowledge Management* , Stroke*\/physiopathology , Stroke*\/therapy , Stroke Rehabilitation* , Translational Research, Biomedical*, Canada ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans","Subjects":"Canada, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Diffusion of Innovation, Knowledge Management, Stroke physiopathology, Stroke therapy, Stroke Rehabilitation, Translational Research, Biomedical","Title_Abbreviations":"The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques","Volume":"43"},"header":{"DbId":"mdl","DbLabel":"MEDLINE Ultimate","An":"27456566","RelevancyScore":"795","PubType":"Academic Journal","PubTypeId":"academicJournal","PreciseRelevancyScore":"795.401245117188"},"plink":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mdl&AN=27456566&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds","upload_link":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mdl&AN=27456566&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds"}
["Janzen S, McIntyre A, Richardson M, Britt E, Teasell R","Publisher: published by Cambridge University Press for the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0415227 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0317-1671 (Print) Linking ISSN: 03171671 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Can J Neurol Sci Subsets: MEDLINE","Journal Article; Review","2016-09-01","The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques [Can J Neurol Sci] 2016 Sep; Vol. 43 (5), pp. 619-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Jul 26.","English","Diffusion of Innovation* , Knowledge Management* , Stroke*\/physiopathology , Stroke*\/therapy , Stroke Rehabilitation* , Translational Research, Biomedical*, Canada ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans","Canada, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Diffusion of Innovation, Knowledge Management, Stroke physiopathology, Stroke therapy, Stroke Rehabilitation, Translational Research, Biomedical","The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques","43"]
Description
The knowledge to action (KTA) process proposed by Graham et al (2006) is a framework to facilitate the development and application of research evidence into clinical practice. The KTA process consists of the knowledge creation cycle and the action cycle. The Evidence Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation is a foundational part of the knowledge creation cycle and has helped guide the development of best practice recommendations in stroke. The Rehabilitation Knowledge to Action Project is an audit-feedback process for the clinical implementation of best practice guidelines, which follows the action cycle. The objective of this review was to: (1) contextualize the Evidence Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Knowledge to Action Project within the KTA model and (2) show how this process led to improved evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Through this process, a single centre was able to change clinical practice and promote a culture that supports the use of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation.