Use of a reference text by pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students: a national cross-sectional survey.

Select Content Type
Clinical Guidelines
Authored By
Mill D, Johnson JL, Corre L, Lee K, D'Lima D, Clifford R, Seubert L, Salter SM, Page AT
Interests
Internal/Family Medicine
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Speciality
Infectious Disease & Vaccines
Internal/Family Medicine
Book Detail
Publisher
Oxford University Press
volume
31
ISSN
2042-7174
Actions
Download in App
Event Data
{"article_title":"Use of a reference text by pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students: a national cross-sectional survey.","author":"Mill D, Johnson JL, Corre L, Lee K, D'Lima D, Clifford R, Seubert L, Salter SM, Page AT","journal_title":"The International journal of pharmacy practice","issn":"2042-7174","isbn":"","publication_date":"2023 Sep 30","volume":"31","issue":"5","first_page":"548","page_count":"","accession_number":"37454279","doi":"10.1093\/ijpp\/riad047","publisher":"Oxford University Press","doctype":"Journal Article","subjects":"","interest_area":["Internal\/Family Medicine"," Infectious Disease & Vaccines"],"abstract":"Background: Reference texts assist pharmacists by addressing knowledge gaps and enabling evidence-based decisions when providing patient care. It is unknown whether reference text utilisation patterns differ between pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students. To describe and compare the self-reported use and perceptions of a reference text, namely the national formulary, by pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students. Methods: Registered pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students living in Australia were surveyed in July 2020. The survey was electronic and self-administered. Questions considered self-reported use of a specific reference text in the preceding 12 months. Key Findings: There were 554 eligible responses out of 774 who commenced the survey: 430 (78%) pharmacists, 45 (8%) intern pharmacists and 79 (14%) pharmacy students. Most participants (529\/554, 96%) reported historical use of the text, though pharmacists were significantly less likely than intern pharmacists and students to use it frequently (52\/422, 12% versus 16\/43, 37% versus 23\/76, 30%, P < 0.001). Pharmacists (44%, 177\/404) reported using the text as a tool to resolve a situation when providing a service or patient care (177\/404, 44%) or as a teaching resource (150\/404, 38%). In contrast, intern pharmacists and students most commonly use these to familiarise themselves with the contents (30\/43, 70%; 46\/76, 61%) or update their knowledge (34\/43, 79%; 53\/76, 70%). Conclusions: Access and use patterns varied significantly across career stages. A broader understanding of the use of reference texts may help develop interventions to optimise the content and usability. Varying usage patterns across the groups may inform the tailoring of texts for future use. \ufffd The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=37454279&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513"}
ISSN
2042-7174
IS_Ebsco
true
Description

Background: Reference texts assist pharmacists by addressing knowledge gaps and enabling evidence-based decisions when providing patient care. It is unknown whether reference text utilisation patterns differ between pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students. To describe and compare the self-reported use and perceptions of a reference text, namely the national formulary, by pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students. Methods: Registered pharmacists, intern pharmacists and pharmacy students living in Australia were surveyed in July 2020. The survey was electronic and self-administered. Questions considered self-reported use of a specific reference text in the preceding 12 months. Key Findings: There were 554 eligible responses out of 774 who commenced the survey: 430 (78%) pharmacists, 45 (8%) intern pharmacists and 79 (14%) pharmacy students. Most participants (529/554, 96%) reported historical use of the text, though pharmacists were significantly less likely than intern pharmacists and students to use it frequently (52/422, 12% versus 16/43, 37% versus 23/76, 30%, P < 0.001). Pharmacists (44%, 177/404) reported using the text as a tool to resolve a situation when providing a service or patient care (177/404, 44%) or as a teaching resource (150/404, 38%). In contrast, intern pharmacists and students most commonly use these to familiarise themselves with the contents (30/43, 70%; 46/76, 61%) or update their knowledge (34/43, 79%; 53/76, 70%). Conclusions: Access and use patterns varied significantly across career stages. A broader understanding of the use of reference texts may help develop interventions to optimise the content and usability. Varying usage patterns across the groups may inform the tailoring of texts for future use. � The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Published Date