Understanding contextual and practical factors to inform WHO recommendations on using chest imaging to monitor COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' perspective.

{"article_title":"Understanding contextual and practical factors to inform WHO recommendations on using chest imaging to monitor COVID-19 pulmonary sequelae: a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' perspective.","author":"Honein-AbouHaidar G, Rizkallah C, Bou Akl I, Morgano GP, Vrbova T, van Deventer E, Del Rosario Perez M, Akl EA","journal_title":"Health research policy and systems","issn":"1478-4505","isbn":"","publication_date":"2024 Jun 11","volume":"22","issue":"1","first_page":"67","page_count":"","accession_number":"38862978","doi":"10.1186\/s12961-023-01088-1","publisher":"BioMed Central","doctype":"Journal Article","subjects":"COVID-19; Qualitative Research; World Health Organization; SARS-CoV-2; Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Stakeholder Participation; Aged; Lung diagnostic imaging; Health Personnel","interest_area":["Infectious Disease & Vaccines"," Radiology"," Pulmonology"," Emergency Medicine"],"abstract":"Background: A recommendation by the World Health Organization (WHO) was issued about the use of chest imaging to monitor pulmonary sequelae following recovery from COVID-19. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspective of key stakeholders to understand their valuation of the outcome of the proposition, preferences for the modalities of chest imaging, acceptability, feasibility, impact on equity and practical considerations influencing the implementation of using chest imaging. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design using in-depth interviews approach. Key stakeholders included adult patients who recovered from the acute illness of COVID-19, and providers caring for those patients. The Evidence to Decision (EtD) conceptual framework was used to guide data collection of contextual and practical factors related to monitoring using imaging. Data analysis was based on the framework thematic analysis approach. Results: 33 respondents, including providers and patients, were recruited from 15 different countries. Participants highly valued the ability to monitor progression and resolution of long-term sequelae but recommended the avoidance of overuse of imaging. Their preferences for the imaging modalities were recorded along with pros and cons. Equity concerns were reported across countries (e.g., access to resources) and within countries (e.g., disadvantaged groups lacked access to insurance). Both providers and patients accepted the use of imaging, some patients were concerned about affordability of the test. Facilitators included post- recovery units and protocols. Barriers to feasibility included low number of specialists in some countries, access to imaging tests among elderly living in nursing homes, experience of poor coordination of care, emotional exhaustion, and transportation challenges driving to a monitoring site. Conclusion: We were able to demonstrate that there is a high value and acceptability using imaging but there were factors influencing feasibility, equity and some practical considerations associated with implementation. We had a few suggestions to be considered by the expert panel in the formulation of the guideline to facilitate its implementation such as using validated risk score predictive tools for lung complications to recommend the appropriate imaging modality and complementary pulmonary function test. \u00a9 2024. World Health Organization and The Author(s).","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=38862978&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513","isPdfLink":true,"isSAML":false,"additionalInfo":{"Authored_By":"Honein-AbouHaidar G, Rizkallah C, Bou Akl I, Morgano GP, Vrbov\u00e1 T, van Deventer E, Del Rosario Perez M, Akl EA","Journal_Info":"Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101170481 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-4505 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14784505 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Res Policy Syst Subsets: MEDLINE","Publication_Type":"Journal Article","Published_Date":"2024-06-11","Source":"Health research policy and systems [Health Res Policy Syst] 2024 Jun 11; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 11.","Languages":"English","Electronic_ISSN":"1478-4505","MeSH_Terms":"COVID-19* , Qualitative Research* , World Health Organization* , SARS-CoV-2*, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Stakeholder Participation ; Aged ; Lung\/diagnostic imaging ; Health Personnel","Subjects":"Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Stakeholder Participation, Aged, Lung diagnostic imaging, Health Personnel, COVID-19, Qualitative Research, World Health Organization, SARS-CoV-2","Title_Abbreviations":"Health research policy and systems","Volume":"22"},"header":{"DbId":"mdl","DbLabel":"MEDLINE Ultimate","An":"38862978","RelevancyScore":"888","PubType":"Academic Journal","PubTypeId":"academicJournal","PreciseRelevancyScore":"887.9365234375"},"plink":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mdl&AN=38862978&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds","upload_link":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=mdl&AN=38862978&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds"}