Chronic Cough Due to Gastroesophageal Reflux in Adults: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Select Content Type
Clinical Guidelines
Authored By
Kahrilas PJ, Altman KW, Chang AB, Field SK, Harding SM, Lane AP, Lim K, McGarvey L, Smith J, Irwin RS
Authored On
Interests
Gastroenterology
Pulmonology
Speciality
Gastroenterology
Pulmonology
Book Detail
volume
150
ISSN
1931-3543
Publication Date
Actions
Download in App
Promotional Categories
Featured
Event Data
{"article_title":"Chronic Cough Due to Gastroesophageal Reflux in Adults: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.","author":"Kahrilas PJ, Altman KW, Chang AB, Field SK, Harding SM, Lane AP, Lim K, McGarvey L, Smith J, Irwin RS","journal_title":"Chest","issn":"1931-3543","isbn":"","publication_date":"2016-12-01","volume":"150","issue":"6","first_page":"1341","page_count":"","accession_number":"27614002","doi":"10.1016\/j.chest.2016.08.1458","publisher":"Elsevier","doctype":"Journal Article","subjects":"Cough etiology; Gastroesophageal Reflux complications; Adult; Chronic Disease; Cough prevention & control; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Gastroesophageal Reflux prevention & control; Humans","interest_area":["Gastroenterology"," Pulmonology"],"abstract":"Background: We updated the 2006 ACCP clinical practice guidelines for management of reflux-cough syndrome. Methods: Two population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were addressed by systematic review: (1) Can therapy for gastroesophageal reflux improve or eliminate cough in adults with chronic and persistently troublesome cough? and (2) Are there minimal clinical criteria to guide practice in determining that chronic cough is likely to respond to therapy for gastroesophageal reflux? Results: We found no high-quality studies pertinent to either question. From available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing question #1, we concluded that (1) there was a strong placebo effect for cough improvement; (2) studies including diet modification and weight loss had better cough outcomes; (3) although lifestyle modifications and weight reduction may be beneficial in suspected reflux-cough syndrome, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) demonstrated no benefit when used in isolation; and (4) because of potential carryover effect, crossover studies using PPIs should be avoided. For question #2, we concluded from the available observational trials that (1) an algorithmic approach to management resolved chronic cough in 82% to 100% of instances; (2) cough variant asthma and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) (previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome) from rhinosinus conditions were the most commonly reported causes; and (3) the reported prevalence of reflux-cough syndrome varied widely. Conclusions: The panelists (1) endorsed the use of a diagnostic\/therapeutic algorithm addressing causes of common cough, including symptomatic reflux; (2) advised that although lifestyle modifications and weight reduction may be beneficial in suspected reflux-cough syndrome, PPIs demonstrated no benefit when used in isolation; and (3) suggested that physiological testing be reserved for refractory patients being considered for antireflux surgery or for those in whom there is strong clinical suspicion warranting diagnostic testing. Copyright \u00c2\u00a9 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.","url":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdl&AN=27614002","isPdfLink":false,"isSAML":false,"an":"27614002","number_other":"","type_pub":"","issn_electronic":"1931-3543","languages":"English","language":"eng","date_entry":"Date Created: 20160911 Date Completed: 20170512 Latest Revision: 20240210","date_update":"20240210","titleSource":"Chest [Chest] 2016 Dec; Vol. 150 (6), pp. 1341-1360. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 07.","date_pub_cy":"","type_document":"","contract_publisher":"","authored_on":"2016-12-01","description":"Background: We updated the 2006 ACCP clinical practice guidelines for management of reflux-cough syndrome.<br \/>Methods: Two population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) questions were addressed by systematic review: (1) Can therapy for gastroesophageal reflux improve or eliminate cough in adults with chronic and persistently troublesome cough? and (2) Are there minimal clinical criteria to guide practice in determining that chronic cough is likely to respond to therapy for gastroesophageal reflux?<br \/>Results: We found no high-quality studies pertinent to either question. From available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing question #1, we concluded that (1) there was a strong placebo effect for cough improvement; (2) studies including diet modification and weight loss had better cough outcomes; (3) although lifestyle modifications and weight reduction may be beneficial in suspected reflux-cough syndrome, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) demonstrated no benefit when used in isolation; and (4) because of potential carryover effect, crossover studies using PPIs should be avoided. For question #2, we concluded from the available observational trials that (1) an algorithmic approach to management resolved chronic cough in 82% to 100% of instances; (2) cough variant asthma and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) (previously referred to as postnasal drip syndrome) from rhinosinus conditions were the most commonly reported causes; and (3) the reported prevalence of reflux-cough syndrome varied widely.<br \/>Conclusions: The panelists (1) endorsed the use of a diagnostic\/therapeutic algorithm addressing causes of common cough, including symptomatic reflux; (2) advised that although lifestyle modifications and weight reduction may be beneficial in suspected reflux-cough syndrome, PPIs demonstrated no benefit when used in isolation; and (3) suggested that physiological testing be reserved for refractory patients being considered for antireflux surgery or for those in whom there is strong clinical suspicion warranting diagnostic testing.<br \/> (Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)","upload_link":"https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=mdl&AN=27614002&authtype=shib&custid=ns346513&group=main&profile=eds","no_of_pages":"","authored_by":"Kahrilas PJ, Altman KW, Chang AB, Field SK, Harding SM, Lane AP, Lim K, McGarvey L, Smith J, Irwin RS"}
ISSN
1931-3543
IS_Ebsco
true
Published Date